Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Thought Zone - Exercise your mind....

 
Think. Think again. And then think some more.

I'm An Atheist And I'm Proud

November 19th 2008 23:10
Sometimes I get the feeling that some people think that atheists should be seen and not heard.

Why is that?

Why is it that religion is so widely accepted in our society that even religions that contradict each other are given equal time and yet atheists are expected to keep their lack of beliefs to themselves?

Not every religion can be the right religion. Either Jesus is the Messiah or he is not. Either Jesus is the Son of God or he is not. Either Mohammed was given the final revelation or he was not. Yet, there are literally hundreds of religions that believe varying degrees of the above and we are told that we must respect them all.

That makes no sense to me.

If Jesus was the Messiah then Judaism is wrong and Jews should convert to Christianity. If Gabriel did indeed command the illiterate Mohammed to read then Christianity is wrong and Christians, along with the newly converted Jews, should convert to Islam.

But that is just the tip of the iceberg. Each of the "great" monotheistic religions has scores of denominations, sects and sub-sects. All of which preclude and contradict the other. They cannot all be right. Which means most, if not all, are wrong.

And yet, I am told that I must respect them all.

Why?

People often accuse atheism of being a religion. Well we know that can't possibly be true. Because people respect religion. And atheism does not command such respect.

It seems that us atheists are fair game to be derided, scorned and belittled. And we are told we cannot speak up. Because if we speak up we are called bigots and hate mongers and liars. Merely discussing our (lack of) beliefs is called attacking religion.

Well I am tired of being told that I have no morals. That I don't feel compassion. That I am devoid of humanity.

Just because I don't believe in God.

No more.

I'm speaking up.

I don't believe in God.

I think people deserve to know all the options before they make up their minds.

And I won't be told to shut up.

I am an atheist.

And I am proud.




152
Vote
Shared on
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
45 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Morgan Bell

November 19th 2008 14:28
ill never understand why people think atheists are all in an organised group with some secret agenda?

silly sausages . . .

Comment by RubySoho

November 19th 2008 14:33
Haha. I guess people are just used to placing people in categories? sometimes the only thing atheists have in common is that they are atheists....i also think they are a little afraid of us? Like what are we going to do, reason with them to death?

Comment by Morgan Bell

November 19th 2008 14:37
well i guess that would be a far less painful way to go than being patronised to death!

Comment by alt_ed

November 19th 2008 23:34
See look at you two little hate mongers! "silly sausages"

Comment by Earl Leonard

November 20th 2008 04:46
Im an agnostic and Im proud. Atheism seams a little too finite and similar to a religiious belief to me, and I'll have none of that thanks. Except if one of them is right, in which case I'm all for it.

Comment by Wynona Lavota

November 20th 2008 07:55
A-theism. An 'a' prefix means a lack of. 'Theism' is the belief in (a) creator/s of the universe. So, by definition, 'atheism' is a lack of religion. Anyone who argues otherwise is a tool.

IMO atheists are the unknown, the odd ones out-like immigrants or homosexuals so they're subject to discrimination because they represent something the theists are scared to explore in themselves. They're scared to question their beliefs, scared to think for themselves because maybe, if they find they cannot believe in their faith anymore due to inconsistancy, human rights abuse etc, what can they believe in? What will fill that void and make them feel safe like religion does? It's a scary thought, losing your comfort, part of your identity, so they attack atheists because they represent the threat of indpendent thought and possible challange to one's one religious beliefs.

Comment by Janet Collins

November 20th 2008 08:32
It's because athiests don't have an organised group or a place to gather.

Comment by Earl Leonard

November 20th 2008 11:05
Wynona Lavota,

Yeah, they'd be a tool... or, y'know, someone with a more sophisticated understanding of language and the usage of words that some try hard smart-arse with a (emphasis on the little) Latin and Greek. (Emoticons don't excuse you from being rude).

If we're talking strict definitions Theism, is belief in deities (gods) and is not synonymous with `religion' since there are religions, such as Taoism and Buddhism, where gods are not required (although some followers of these faiths do believe in the existence of gods, the religions' basic tenants are not dependant upon their existence). Similarly many pagan religions don't hold that the gods created the universe as you surmise, but only that they govern it.

However in day-to-day usage Atheism is used to mean non-religious. I.e. the meaning of a word is not precisely the same as its compounds.

And anyway I wasn't arguing that Atheism was a religion I said that it (meaning as a position) seemed too finite. Eg Since Atheism requires a belief that there are no gods or, more generally speaking, that the religions of the world are incorrect it has something in common with religions that Agnosticism (my position) does not. Belief.

While I think their is sufficient evidence to dismiss most major religions so called reasons behind their belief systems I refute the idea that this automatically dismisses the possibility of deities or indeed an accurate religion, and prefer to remain noncommittal to a position until a more workable theory is presented.

As to your second paragraph... your being simplistic but I don't disagree with some of your basic premises.

E.

RubySoho, thanks for the thought provoking mini manifesto!

Comment by RubySoho

November 20th 2008 12:24
Hi Earl, I think Wynona is right, atheism is simply a lack of belief in God. It doesn't mean that we swear blindly that there is no god of any sort (as in Biblical or otherwise), but it does mean that we are skeptical enough to live our lives as if there were none.

I don't think atheism is like a religion at all, we have no sacraments, we make no prayers, we do not worship.

We simply go about living our lives without any regard for the supernatural.

Also, Is there really a significant difference between an agnostic and an atheist? Doesn't it amount to much the same thing ie we don't adhere to any religion?

Thanks for the comments everyone.

Comment by Wynona Lavota

November 20th 2008 21:35
Hello again,

When I made my point about the definition of atheism, I was refering to the part of the blog entry that says

People often accuse atheism of being a religion. Well we know that can't possibly be true.

not to anyone's comments.

I did not mean to be rude with my 'tool' comment and I used the emoticon to show that I meant no harm.

The definition of theism I used came straight form the Oxford Enlgish Dictionary, I argue that this is the strict definition of the word but people have used it to cover a wider range of religions.

Also with my last paragraph, of course I was being simplistic, I'm certainly not going to post an essay as a blog reply (although this reply is getting pretty lengthy).

Comment by Earl Leonard

November 20th 2008 22:43
Ok, Wynona, sorry I was a bit tetchy because Id just had an argument on another blog! (Very bad form) So, I’m sorry for being over sensitive and rude, though I stand by Atheism not being the same thing as non-religious. Since many Buddhists, adherents of Shinto and- dare I say it- Scientologists consider themselves Atheist without any apparent contradiction. And I used the oxford too! (Mine must be a different edition, or we made different conclusions from the same source material, which of course happens all the time).

Ruby, like I said I don’t mean to say Atheism is a religion or indeed very much like a religion at all, but it is a philosophical position that requires an element of belief, (i.e. it has one thing in common with religion) and I prefer the subtly different position of agnosticism, that deems there is too little evidence one way or the other to form a definite opinion, so doesn't believe anything (but disbelieves plenty).

Its justifiable cynical fence sitting! Come on, give it a try!

Oops, now I'm acting like I'm in a religion...

Comment by Jeff Musall

November 21st 2008 00:27
YES!!! I'm an Atheist, and I'm proud....you know, sure - there may be a god. I think my position as an Atheist is this...I don't believe in god, I don't see any evidence at all pointing to a god. I do see that if a god exists, the universe is the worse for it. In short, if there is a god, I'll be damned surprised. "Believers" like to say we, as Atheists, don't have any reason to live, love, or be moral. The opposite is true. We do it for ourselves, and the greater good. Not to please a fear-mongering hate-machine called god.

Comment by Lilla

November 21st 2008 04:38
Ruby,

If you asked me, (and I am aware nobody did), but if you did, I would probably say that Religion is to me (and always has been) a means of DIvide and Conquer, used to either (a) subordinate a minority group (usually something considered threatening and usually women) power to us I guess, which it soon will be as adepts at astrology will attest to...um.. where was I, oh yes, or (b) a means for those in power to segregate, control and destroy in the name of their saviour. Shoot to kill. Amen.

Sometimes, Like Lennon, when all is still I try to imagine a world with no religion at all, but that doesnt mean i am not a spiritual being, who is removed from the space I live in, subject to the same forces as the next human being in the next space... nor that that space in and around me has an intelligence that is above my own understanding and ignorance in equal doses. Nor that it may have an agenda which would be like trying to explain quantum physics to a sparrow and probably fry its brain.

So I have only the impermenance of my life to focus on, which brings me back to square one, where I realise that I am moved to move by an irresistable force, to unfold, to learn and to experience; most of all to grow in the abilities of forgiveness as a means of self preservation, which if ignored causes me great pain and suffering. I do not need a dogma to outline this truth to me, nor direct it, only to obey it to be happy. Does that make me an atheist?

What if everyone just knew they were important, and taken care off and loved, because that is what all these ostrecised Prophets were trying to tell us, (well except Mohammed who was actually a warrior king first, killing hundreds before changing his bad ways) ...

Protection from charismatic types is perhaps an atheists strongest protection?

*chuckle* I guess to answer your question (which was very thought provoking) .. everyone just assumes that if there is no God, Origin or UCA (Unknown Creative Agency) then there would be little to talk about because there would be nothing to argue over?

Lilla ...

.


Comment by RubySoho

November 21st 2008 05:39
Ohhh just quickly before I go Lilla you have just hit on my next post- John Lennon's Imagine and the dream of a secular humanist world.

I'll comment in depth later tonight.

Cheers everyone, I'm glad my little declaration has inspired many to express their views.

Comment by Wynona Lavota

November 21st 2008 08:34
Not a problem Earl Leonard, no need to apologise. Thank you for pointing out the differnt uses of 'atheist', it will give me something to consider- on top of updating my dictionary!

Comment by Morgan Bell

November 21st 2008 09:04
hi Earl,

I was a bit tetchy because Id just had an argument on another blog!

i know exactly the post you mean . . . and i dont blame you!

i think theres a few really antagonistic users on this site that are only interested in being rude to people and causing dramas

from the post in question:

However in regards to being `...quick to tout their scientific qualifications': you asked, dude! It’s a bit disingenuous to draw issue with us answering.

im glad you found that as astounding as i did!

i think attempting to discuss things with people who arent open to listening seems to just put you in a "no-win" situation . . . but im glad you tried, i found your take on the certainty of fact to be a really interesting read!




Comment by jamoz

November 22nd 2008 06:06
If you speak loud enough perhaps even God will hear you. Pride goeth before a fall.

Comment by Earl Leonard

November 22nd 2008 07:38
Wynona, no worries then!

Morgan, yeah, exactly.

I think in part people get so used to `sound bite' points and summaries (coupled with a pop cultural belief that twists `everyone has an equal right to an opinion' into `all opinions are equal') that their willingness to anylise the nuances of an argument diminishes. On the other hand I am a wordy bastard so I can't blame people for switching off too much!

It didn't help that half the time I couldn't understand what they were trying to say either (slang, poor syntax and bad jokes)!

Damn even when someone agrees with me I can't talk straight... my wife must have the patience of a saint.

Jamoz, I thought the whole point was that god heard you no matter how loudly you spoke? (Its more a question of how he responds...). And some falls are felix culpa and everyone diserves a chance of redemption (heck, God would forgive Lucifer if he but asked, or at least that's my understanding).

Comment by Morgan Bell

November 22nd 2008 09:54
hi Earl,

haha yes very bad jokes!

that particular brand of humour where they talk jibberish and attempt to bamboozle can be really grating at times . . . i think they need to get their dictionaries out and actually look up what a few words actually mean!

reading along with your blog id say your wife is one lucky lady, probing thoughtful discussion AND a personal chef! if you werent married you would be Cleo bachelor of the year!

Comment by RubySoho

November 22nd 2008 15:02
Hi Earl, what belief is it that you think atheism requires? As I understand it atheism is simply lacking a belief. There is not enough evidence to propel me to believe in God. There is no belief, only an absence of belief. Would you say that not believing in fairies and pink unicorns requires an element of believe? Why is God given a greater credence than either of the above examples? I really see no difference. If you want me (not you personally), to believe in something it is your job to convince me, it is not my job to prove you wrong.

Hi Jeff
, I also get upset when people equate atheism with amorailty. That's why i wrote my post on Secular Humanism.

Hi Lilla, I always like hearing your opinions, and this is no exception. Some of what you say is touched on by the Secualr Humanists declaration which differentiates between religious experience and the supernatural. You can be sprititual without having to accept all the trappings of religion.

Hi Jamoz, Well heck, if God would just give me a sign, I'll gladly retract my declarations of atheism.

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 23rd 2008 02:35
I thought it was: "I'm an atheist and I'm bright" - isn't that the word rather than proud?

I see that all the usual suspects have rounded themselves up to compliment themselves again on how great it is to be an atheist.

Sometimes I get the feeling that some people think that atheists should be seen and not heard.

Oh, puleese. Stop sounding so pathetic. Atheists get plenty of air time, especially via Richard Dawkins.

...atheists are expected to keep their lack of beliefs to themselves?

Yeah, right. If atheists kept their views to themselves they'd be completely ignored, and that's something the average atheist can't cope with.

And yet, I am told that I must respect them all.

I don't know where you get this idea from. I've never read anywhere that atheists are supposed to respect anybody - and quite honestly, I've never read a blog or a book in which they do respect anybody else's beliefs. Seems to me you were just having a pity party day and all your friends joined in! LOL

Comment by Jeff Musall

November 23rd 2008 21:39
Mike, I don't know where you get your info - but what I see is that Atheism is in very low regard by most, that it is looked down upon with gazed looks and a look of non-comprehension, and that it is grounds, in the view of many, to utterly dismiss the person who is an Atheist. That said, I'm not whining - but I am changing things.....

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 23rd 2008 21:58
I don't think there's any problem with comprehending atheism. You don't believe in any gods, and you live you life on that basis. What's uncomprehendible about that?

Seems to me atheists, at least those on blogs, spend most of their time moaning about the fact that people who believe in God/gods don't like them and don't agree with them. Perhaps it's time atheists just got on with it and stopped fussing so much. But then people would ignore you, and, from my understanding, atheists - in modern Western society at least - don't like to be ignored. They want everyone to hear that they are right and everyone else is wrong.

Dawkins once compared saying you were an atheist to coming out of the closet. Yeah, right. Tell that to the homosexuals who really do have difficulties in life.

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 00:10
That's about the funniest thing I have ever heard. A religious person pretending to give a shit about the difficulties faced by homosexuals. Hey, guess what made life difficult for them in the first place?


Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 00:30
As always you ignore the response and jump in with your anti-religious bias, Ruby. And you have no idea what I personally think about homosexuals, even though you assume that you do, because as always you jump in with your anti-religious thing so that all your responses end up with the same approach. Religion's to blame for everything, and that's about the extent of your thinking.

Religion doesn't make life difficult for homosexuals; the fact of being a homosexual in the first place makes life difficult for them. Whether they like it or not, they're out of kilter with a world that is built on the male/female model.


Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 00:45
Regardless what you personally think of homosexuals Mike, it is blatantly obvious that monotheistic religion does not approve of their lifestyle. Are you denying the numerous passages in the Bible that call homosexuality an abomination?

Are you also denying that it is the Religious Right in America who is spearheading the discrimination against same sex couples by changing the law to ban same sex marriage? And that is religious politicians in Australia such as Steven Feliding who most vehemently oppose same sex marriage?

Are you also denying that the "world built in the male/female model" is based on the patriarchal religious system?

Out of kilter with the world? Sounds to me like you are blaming homosexuals for their own discrimination. Hey, if you guys would just stop being so different then we wouldn't have to pick on you!

And please don't talk to me about MY bias, Mike. Have a look at your comments. Atheists are this. Atheists are that. That's exactly what I am talking about. Religion demands respect despite the fact it affords none to those who disagree with it.

I'd be happy to have an actual discussion with you but if you think it is acceptable to come on here and ridicule me and then have the audacity to cry foul because I don't respect you back, then matey, you are on the wrong blog.

Comment by alt_ed

November 24th 2008 00:58
Religion doesn't make life difficult for homosexuals; the fact of being a homosexual in the first place makes life difficult for them.
Mike, are you serious?

I'm sorry, but I why should I have to deal with flack from people over my life choices. Choices which have NO effect on them? Being gay doesn't mean I want EVERYONE on earth to be gay, it's a personal choice, my choice!

Now, before someone pipes up and says, well if you choose to be gay, you can choose not to be- well, no I didn't choose to be gay, I just am, and I am content in myself... I have chosen however to live my life as an openly gay person, thus having to deal with faecal matter and prejudice from God bother'ers the world over!

I guess though, people that criticise my lifestyle are the ones trying to fill voids within their own... So what, I can't legally marry my partner; But since when did a piece of paper affirm that a couple's relationship was loving and committed? Certainly, I would get married if I could, but until then I'll remain content with the house and dog!

Oh, and Mike, you know, some people think it's worse to be Ugly than Gay... I like those people, cos in their eyes, you're the one out of kilter with the world!



Comment by Jeff Musall

November 24th 2008 01:06
Wow....there's a good one - so if them queers would just shut up quit their gay ways and follow God - all would be well -thats' what you're saying, right Mike? If you follow that line of thinking then I suppose if blacks weren't just so damn dark-skinned, they would have always had equal rights? If women had been smart enough to be born with different plumbing...just wow. That's all I can say.

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 01:23
Yes, I am serious. You'll note that I didn't say at any point that homosexuals are to blame for the way they are. What I said is that homosexuals will struggle because of the way they are, because the world we all live in is built on male/female lines, like it or not This has nothing to do with religion, but with how things function. And it certainly isn't a patriarchal thing. Men and women were men and women long before there was any idea of patriarchy.
alt-ed, you jumped to conclusions about criticism of your lifestyle. If you'd read what I'd written, without assuming it was critical, you'd have seen that I don't criticise gays in the least in my comment.
As always on this blog, anyone who dares to speak against what's being said is labelled for being different. Hmm...that sounds pretty much like what you're accusing me of! LOL

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 01:57

Dude, I think you labelled yourself with this comment:

Religion doesn't make life difficult for homosexuals; the fact of being a homosexual in the first place makes life difficult for them. Whether they like it or not, they're out of kilter with a world that is built on the male/female model.


And this:

I see that all the usual suspects have rounded themselves up to compliment themselves again on how great it is to be an atheist.

And this:

Yeah, right. If atheists kept their views to themselves they'd be completely ignored, and that's something the average atheist can't cope with.

And this

Oh, puleese. Stop sounding so pathetic
.

It's not that you are speaking out against what is being said. It's more that you are being a complete dick as you do it.

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 02:01
So that's your argument, Ruby? Someone's a complete dick just because they don't agree with your profundities? Or because they question your views? One of these days, perhaps, I'll get a surprise, and find that you actually respond to comments on your blog with some of the 'reason' you're always proclaiming. But I won't hold my breath.

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 02:21
Mike what game are you playing? You came on here all hostile and patronising and then have the nerve to claim that I am being unreasonable?

Again, I will tell if you want an actual discussion then I will give it you. But you have not actually brought up any worthwhile points. All you have done is bag atheists.

Disagree with me all you like but don't expect me to show you respect after you have called me a pathetic, attention seeking pity-party holder.


Is that your idea of reasoned argument?

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 02:28
But Ruby, you did begin this discussion by being a pathetic, attention-seeking pity-party holder! Or have you forgotten what you wrote already?

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 02:38
Hmmm. Well I guess that IS your attempt at reasoned argument. In which case all I can say is rack off please. I can't be bothered. Cheers.

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 03:06
Yup....the usual response from your blogs; if you don't agree with me, get lost.

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 03:31
If you disagree with me, tell me why.

If you are simply being a tool, get lost.

That's the usual response from my blog.

You are not disagreeing with me. You are being a tool. Get lost.

Comment by alt_ed

November 24th 2008 03:33
I know this is simplistic, but I had two rabbits (both male) and they used to hump all day long... but you're right Mike, the world is soo built on the Male - Female model.

Although, who was Adam fucking before God created Eve... was he just getting some good ol'fashion God-Lovin?

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 03:52
Come on, Ruby, get real. Is this the way you treat everybody who disagrees with you? Rack off, being a tool, complete dick? Does this sound like someone who's prepared to argue their case? Not to me.

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 04:03
For the last time NO IT IS NOT THE WAY I TREAT EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME. BUT YOUR PROBLEM IS NOT THAT YOU ARE SIMPLY DISAGREEING WITH ME. YOUR PROBLEM IS THAT YOU ARE INSULTING ME AND DELIBERATELY PROVOKING ME AND OTHERS WHO HAVE COMMENTED HERE AND THEN PLAYING VICTIM WHEN I TELL YOU I DON'T LIKE THE WAY YOU ARE BEHAVING.

Did spelling it out in capitals make it any clearer? Because I simply can't think of any other way in which I can get through to you.

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 08:32
I thought you might have used capitals AND italics! LOL

Your best way of avoiding the current situation would be to ignore those who provoke you, but it's interesting that every time I've responded you've had to try and have the last word...

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 11:44
Well it IS my blog Mike. If I can't give myself the last word then who will?


Comment by Postmodern Critic

November 24th 2008 12:46
Being an atheist is fabulous. It shows a lot of confidence and healthy self-esteem practices, a degree of autonomy and plenty of imagination.

Ruby, your '... to death' line recalls Buffy to me - were you ever a viewer or fan of this show?

Mike - A male/female model that everybody except homosexuals conform to? Your kind of startling narrow-mindedness recalls Ahmed. I'm sure you two would just LOVE each other.

Comment by RubySoho

November 24th 2008 13:10
Oh good PoMo is here. Do you mind going over to my John Lennon post? Ahmed is already there and he is itching for a fight! I don't think he enjoys arguing with me as much as he does you.

And no, I have never seen Buffy.

Comment by Mike Crowl

November 24th 2008 19:43
Well it IS my blog Mike. If I can't give myself the last word then who will?

Glad to see you seem to have got your sense of humour back - thought you'd fallen down a large hole screaming for a bit there.

Comment by Anonymous

December 17th 2008 02:57

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
12 Posts
180 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

RubySoho's Blogs

812 Vote(s)
66 Comment(s)
10 Post(s)
Moderated by RubySoho
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |