Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Thought Zone - Exercise your mind....

 
Think. Think again. And then think some more.

Please Tell Me This Isn't Really True...

June 12th 2008 01:55
sudoku: more entertaining than your average drug trial...



From BBC News:


Sudoku-playing jurors halt trial


A drugs trial has been abandoned in Australia after several jurors admitted they had spent much of their time playing Sudoku in the courtroom.

Judge Peter Zahra aborted proceedings after the jury forewoman admitted she and four others had been playing the popular puzzles to fight off boredom.

The problem was discovered when some of the jurors were observed writing notes vertically rather than horizontally.

Sudoku involves completing a grid of numbers in the correct sequence.

The three-month trial had cost taxpayers more than A$1m (US$945,000) and the two accused men faced possible life sentences.

One of the jurors explained that the puzzle had helped keep her "mind busy" as she listened to repeated testimonies from the witness box.

"Some of the evidence is rather drawn out, and I find it difficult to maintain my attention the whole time," the juror told the Australian Associated Press.

Lawyers had presumed the scribbling they could see jurors doing was note-taking.

"We actually all thought they were quite a diligent jury," lawyer Robyn Hakelis told ABC local radio.
"The judge had made many comments about what a good jury they were, how they were taking copious amounts of notes."

There is no legal action that can be taken against jurors for doing puzzles during a trial, so they will face no penalty for their behaviour.

A fresh trial is expected to begin in a few weeks, once a new jury has been called.




Let's just analyse this shall we? Five jurors, including the head juror, who had the lives of two men in their hands used those hands to play Sudoku in the courtroom rather than listen to the evidence presented that would give them the information they needed to decide whether the men should go free or spend their lives in jail.

The thought of being on a jury terrifies me. It is not a job I take lightly and what I fear is the possibility of sending an innocent person to jail. Whilst the thought of the guilty roaming free doesn't make me feel all warm and fuzzy, the thought of another human locked up in prison for a crime they did not commit positively turns my stomach. Recently, I caught up with a criminal lawyer
friend of mine who had had a really bad day having just lost three trials. In two of the cases he thought the defendant was most likely guilty. But in the third, he was absolutely sure of his innocence and was devastated at the guilty verdict. This man has just been handed a life sentence. They are appealing the verdict.

That's why the above article infuriates me. I don't understand how these five people could care so little for the lives of other people and show such little regard for a justice system, which although by no means perfect, actually allows for the accused to be judged by a jury of their peers, and not just thrown in jail without a decent trial as is still so prevalent in much of the world.

Did these people really not understand the implications of their actions? Did they just not care? How is it that people can take our justice system for granted? We worked so hard to get to this point and it saddens me that people don't realise when they have got something good.

Five jurors made a mockery of a court trial because they were bored. What were they expecting, clowns? Jugglers? A strip show? Half-time entertainment from past Australian Idol finalists?

Dumb, dumb, dumb.

120
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
16 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Louie

June 12th 2008 02:07
hahaha, too funny, i swear that would be me. Sudoku is soooo addictive ive had to bar myself from playing....

the scary thing is that they were a) allowed to have the books/paper/magazine in there and b) no-one noticed what they were doing for so long..what a great system

Comment by Kleonaptra

June 12th 2008 04:33
Eh...Unfortunately they probably were expecting a stripper or two...

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 12th 2008 05:46
yeah i agree with Louie on this why were they permitted to bring their puzzle books into the courtroom? isnt it the role of the stenographer to take notes that the jury can review in deliberations? sounds like bad court procedure to me!

our judicial system has become a total joke, we may aswell not have any law, they are never enforced properly . . .

Comment by RubySoho

June 12th 2008 05:59
Hi ladies...maybe they hid the puzzles in their notebook? Who knows? As i said, I know the court system is not perfect, but at least these men were getting a trial. i don't know why this story makes me so angry...but it does.

Comment by Thoraiya Dyer

June 12th 2008 08:11
I can't believe they're not facing any penalties. I've never been on a jury, but surely they have to swear some sort of oath or something?

If they really didn't want to be there, there are a hundred ways they could have gotten out of it. Two of my friends have avoided jury duty simply by saying, "I have to work" or "I have to babysit my nephew."

I've always thought there should be an IQ test for jurors (and parents, and pet owners, etc); maybe there should be a Consideration For Other Human Beings test as well.

The local hospital sure could have used that million dollars that was wasted.

Comment by RubySoho

June 12th 2008 08:45
Well Thoraiya you have just expressed why it is I am so angry-
waste of time, waste of money and a total lack of consideration.

Comment by Winston

June 12th 2008 14:03
If the Australian jury system DID include clowns, jugglers and strippers, I would consider moving.

Comment by Lilla

June 13th 2008 00:56
Hi Ruby,

Another outrageous post!

The thought of being on a jury terrifies me. It is not a job I take lightly and what I fear is the possibility of sending an innocent person to jail.

Or letting a guilty one go scott free?

I did a bit of court reporting during earlier 'active' journalist days and I couldn't agree more with anyone on this dillemma... how could any soul of conscience not pay attention to every nuance of speech and movement of muscle in such a circumstance?

and the money?

oh don;t get me started on the people who still think that money is just shipped in by the space-ship-load each night... who don't realise it's our PLANET RESOURCES ....

*shaking head* sad, very very sad.

Lilla ...

Comment by Jessicca

June 13th 2008 03:33
Oh my gosh!

I thought Jurors are suppose to listed to the case tentatively!

Comment by RubySoho

June 13th 2008 03:56
Winston all I can offer you are long, flowing black robes and silly wigs I'm afraid.

Hi Lilla, who was it that said "I would rather a hundred guilty men go free than a single innocent man go to prison?" I do subscribe to that point of view. Actually my lawyer friend told me that I'm the sort of juror he would love to have on a trial- because he knows that in order to get a guilty verdict they would virtually have to have a picture of the defendant's hand in the cookie jar.

Hi Jessica. It's crazy isn't it? They knew what was at stake and I just can't understand how they could all be so blase about the lives of other people. Imagine if they hadn't gotten caught and had made a decision without actually listening to the evidence. Amazing.

Comment by Anonymous

June 13th 2008 05:46
One thing that should be done and that will help stop jurors playing games is to pay them more. A lot more!

Comment by stu-kicks

June 13th 2008 06:52
suduku is lame anyway. id be bringin in a gameboy or sweet game gear.

Comment by Lilla

June 13th 2008 07:33
oops its playing up again (double commenting) .... hang on ...

Comment by Lilla

June 13th 2008 07:34
Hi Ruby,

I used to be as stuanch in my view... then I watched Dead Man Walking, which was based on a true story...very spooky and I recommend it to you if you haven;t seen it already... it got me, it really got me, thinking...

It was perhaps when I first realised how fine the line actually is in reality.

Lilla ...


Comment by Jeff Musall

June 15th 2008 20:10
A big flaw in the jury system is exposed....if one is to be judged by a jury, one hopes they aren't a gaggle of idiots...just look at what happened in the O.J. Simpson trial, eh?

Comment by RubySoho

June 16th 2008 02:22
Well Jeff, methinks in the case of the OJ trial, that jury wasn't so much a bunch of idiots as they were...bought and paid for...

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
6 Posts
18 Posts
15 Posts
141 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

RubySoho's Blogs

652 Vote(s)
55 Comment(s)
9 Post(s)
Moderated by RubySoho
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]