Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Thought Zone - Exercise your mind....

 
Think. Think again. And then think some more.

UK Parliament Votes On Hybrid Stem Cell Research. Score: Science 1, Catholic Church 0

May 21st 2008 07:41
An innocent embryo? Or a 21st century Frankenstein's monster?


In a previous post Holy Cow! Is It A Man Or A Bull?. I discussed the introduction of legislation in the UK that would allow the creation of hybrid embryos for stem cell research. The process involves injecting human sperm into cow ovaries with the resulting embryos kept for up to 14 days to harvest stem cells for the purpose of scientific studies into diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, diabetes and stroke.

The Catholic Church condemned the creation of hybrid embryos as “monstrous experiments of Frankenstein proportions”.

The legislation was debated in the UK parliament on Monday May 19 with an overwhelming 336 ministers voting down a cross party attempt to ban the research, with 176 voting in favour of the ban. The bid to ban hybrid embryos was led by Catholic cabinet ministers Ruth Kelly, Des Browne and Paul Murphy. Labour PM Gordon Brown and Tory opposition leader David Cameron joined forces to oppose the ban.

The majority of the conservative Tory shadow cabinet voted contrary to their leader with ex-minister Edward Leigh claiming they are "ethically wrong and almost certainly medically useless". Medically useless? I guess the scientists are just doing it for the sheer fun of the process then. Leigh goes on to say that there is "no evidence yet to substantiate" the claims that hybrid embryo’s could help in the treatment of disease. How do like them apples? No evidence yet. Yet. Yes Mr Leigh, that’s the whole point. That’s why it’s called research, so that scientists can determine whether or not hybrid embryos are indeed going to prove useful in studying and combating these diseases.

Although the government and scientists have been quick to point out that the hybrid embryos would not be implanted into a woman or animal, detractors are still having none of it, wondering where it will all lead. Obviously these people have been watching too much Island of Dr Moraeu type schlock science/horror/B grade nonsense.

Leigh again: “We do not believe that regulation is enough. We believe this is a step too far and therefore should be banned. In embryos, we do have the genetic make up of a complete human being and we could not and should not be spliced together with the animal kingdom."

Yes, Mr Leigh, that’s what the Catholic Church said about the smallpox vaccine. They were wrong about that too weren’t they?

Note to the Catholic Church: The Dark Ages are over. But really, don’t feel too bad about it. I mean, hey, you’ve had a pretty good run having spent the better part of two thousand years controlling the hearts and minds of the public, what with your twin fail safe methods of guilt and fear. But your day in the sun is over. Time to make way for science and reason. To paraphrase Bob Dylan:

“Don’t criticise what you don’t understand.
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command.
Your old road is rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'.







Ruby


References:

BBC: MPs back hybrid embryo research

BBC: UK's first hybrid embryo's created


Images from BBC NEWS.



123
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Recent Posts:
      Leave Brittany Alone... 
      ThoughtZone: Fair and Balanced 
      The Cutest Picture In The World 
Comments
14 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Cheryl J

May 21st 2008 09:11
I have to say, even though I'm pro stem-cell research and not in the least bit religious, this research makes my blood run cold. Irrational? Maybe.

This just makes me incredibly uncomfortable for reasons I can't quite articulate. Hmmm.


Comment by RubySoho

May 21st 2008 11:13
HI Cheryl, I don't think its an irrational reaction. Probably natural actually. My first reaction was similar. But like so many things that involve venturing into the unknown, it involves suspending your misgivings long enough to actually work out what and how they intend to conduct the research. The post of mine that I linked to above goes into a little more detail and there are a few very insightful comments left by other readers.

Firstly, they are using cow ovaries because human ones are too rare.Secondly, it is heavily regulated and the embryo's have to be destroyed by the 14 day mark.

I guess its the whole slippery slope argument as in what will this lead to? But with the regulations in place, I don't see why it has to lead to anything other than a better understanding of treating diseases which has thus far eluded science and medicine. IVF was met with a similar outcry. And as one of the scientists involved in the study has said "we are talking about a clump of cells'.

Actually, that's why I included the Dylan quote "don't criticise what you don't understand". If we all understood a little more about exactly what was being done we may not be so afraid of it.

Comment by Cheryl J

May 21st 2008 14:00
I just went and read your original post and the comments made. It's an interesting subject. I think the idea makes me nervous because of the slippery slope you mentioned. Although guidelines would be put in place, how long until someone pushes the envelope further? It's an issue I'd have to do a lot of further research on before I could comment from an informed point of view. Hybrids don't even factor into the equation as humans and cattle are genetically too far apart for that to even be a consideration.

Xenotransplantation has been bandied about as a possibility for those dying on donor transplant lists and that argument has been raging for years. I would have to say a cluster of cells would sit much better with me than the use of animals specifically for the use of organ donation even if they could find a way to make it work and at present it's impossible.

Ethics definitely have a place in the argument both for and against but religion should play no part as religious views on medicine itself can vary wildly. Jehovah's Witnesses don't agree with blood transfusions but it's a procedure that is carried out daily and the majority of the population has no objection to it as it saves lives. Already there are many human products in routine medical use that are made by genetically manipulated micro-organisms, eg insulin, growth hormone and vaccines.

You've made me want to delve deeper.

Comment by Winston

May 21st 2008 14:36
Good post Ruby. I don't think I need to tell you how I feel about this issue!

Comment by Morgan Bell

May 21st 2008 14:43
i think i said all i had to say about the science behind it on your last "bull" post . . . but it is very interesting to read about the politics involved and who the stakeholders are . . . great research!

Comment by Hatchy

May 21st 2008 14:45
there are reasons why humans find such research so disturbing. I believe that those reasons stem far deeper then even the most profound lyrics of Bob Dylan (all hail the man).

the reasons stem so deep they take us back to our very beginnings as human beings. It's the same feeling we feel when we think about incest. Of course it's morally wrong, but it's also profoundly against human nature. To breed within ones own family blood line in our early stages of evolutionary development, would be detrimental to the tribe's continuity.

You did mention that your first reaction to this whole thing "was similar". How many times have you said to yourself..."I should have gone with my gut reaction"

I think that has to have some weight in this argument, don't you think Ruby?

Comment by RubySoho

May 21st 2008 15:09
You've made me want to delve deeper.

Cheryl, that's just about the greatest compliment anyone could give me.

Thanks Winston and Morgan. I just thought I'd give an update. I'm glad the parliament didn't support the ban. I actually thought they would, or at least thought it would be a lot closer. Actually the UK is really impressing me at the moment- they just approved asylum for a gay Iranian teenager whose boyfriend was executed for homosexuality in Iran and who would no doubt suffer the same fate if he went back and to a former Iranian soldier who deserted after refusing to plant land mines.

Hello Hatchy. My first reaction to this was a base knee-jerk reaction. Cows and humans? How gross! But I educated myself, read about the what the scientists had planned and why they doing it and I find it is not only above board but entirely admirable.

No-one is "breeding" the hybrid embryo's Hatchy. In fact, it is a scientific impossibility- such cross species embryos cannot survive and would spontaneously abort even if they were implanted. They are being experimented with at the earliest of embryonic stages- when they are just "a clump of cells". And these experiments could bring about untold benefits to patients with so many diseases.

I should have gone with my gut reaction? Come on, what's my "gut reaction" got to do with scientific research? My gut reaction in this case was based on ignorance. I'm sure a scientist who read the same initial report may well have had a different "gut reaction".



Comment by Louie

May 22nd 2008 00:19
with 176 voting in favour of the ban. The bid to ban hybrid embryos was led by Catholic cabinet ministers Ruth Kelly, Des Browne and Paul Murphy.


good to see the separation of Church and State is working effectively. i understand what the Catholic Church is afraid of but really, this research can save lives, they should work on regulating uses for the scientific discoveries not stopping the research all together, in my humble opinion

Great post, thanks



Comment by RubySoho

May 22nd 2008 01:36
Hey Louie, yes I agree with your humble opinion. It's simply a matter of overcoming fear and superstition. I think the church still operates largely on both, so when it comes to matters such as this, I don't really think it is all that qualified to comment.

And yes, this research is heavily regulated. No mad scientists toiling the night away in back yard labs here...

Comment by postmoderncritic

May 22nd 2008 02:07
I don't actually have a problem with this research at all... I'd love to witness the resultant creation, actually, I think it would be fascinating to see what happened!

Comment by RubySoho

May 22nd 2008 02:55
heya PoMo...well actually there will not be a resultant "creature". See that's where the Church gets it wrong with that whole Frankenstein nonsense- the scientists will remove the DNA from the cow egg before injecting the sperm so nothing can ever come of it. It really is simply experimenting with groups of cells. And they will be destroyed at the 14 day mark.


Comment by Jeff Musall

May 22nd 2008 02:58
Science marches inexorably long....it's amazing that we still have to go through in essence the same thing Galileo had to face (minus the potential burning, of course) to move science past ignorance....

Comment by postmoderncritic

May 22nd 2008 03:05
Thanks for clearing that up...
In that case, what on earth are people getting so agitated about?

Comment by RubySoho

May 22nd 2008 03:14
Hi Jeff, what I find amazing is that somehow science does still manage to march forward, even with all the opposition it faces from the superstitious sphere. I'm not surprised the Church opposes it, the more science reveals the reality of our biology and the world around us, the more obsolete religion becomes. I guess they are just going into self-preservation mode.

If you want to see what happens when we let fear, ignorance and superstition rule our senses click here: Really Long Link

PoMo, see above.


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
1 Posts
204 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

RubySoho's Blogs

1008 Vote(s)
72 Comment(s)
11 Post(s)
Moderated by RubySoho
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]